Using remifentanil in mechanically ventilated rats to provide continuous analgosedation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Remifentanil is a potent synthetic opioid with sedative effects. Intravenous remifentanil provides deep sedation and analgesia in laboratory animals during experimental procedures. We hypothesized that remifentanil would provide effective analgosedation during assisted mechanical ventilation without affecting respiratory mechanics in rats. Five male Sprague- Dawley rats (weight, 400 to 450 g) were assigned to receive assisted mechanical ventilation with continuous positive airway pressure for 5 h. Remifentanil (0.4 μg/kg/min IV) was delivered for the duration of ventilation. There were no differences between baseline, 1 h, and 5 h of ventilation in the mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, heart rate, and body temperature of all rats. Similarly, no differences were observed in the tidal volume, respiratory rate and minute ventilation, and gas exchange was equal in all rats at all time points. Frequent assessment of sedation by toe pinch documented loss of the pedal withdrawal reflex in all rats. We conclude that continuous remifentanil infusion provides sufficient analgosedation for mechanically ventilated rats without compromising hemodynamics, respiratory function, or gas exchange.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".