Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aboriginal Oral Traditions: Theory, Practice, Ethics, edited by Renée Hulan and Renate Eigenbrod, reviewed by Maureen Simpkins, 19:242\n“Abundance and Distribution of Lesser Snow and Ross’s Geese in the Rainwater Basin and Central Platte River Valley of Nebraska,” Mark P. Vrtiska and Susan Sullivan, 19:147\nAcquaah, George. book review by, 19:256\nAdams, Clark E., and John K. Thomas. Texas Rattlesnake Roundups, reviewed by Carl J. Franklin, 19:259\nThe Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority, edited by Jonathan Swainger, reviewed by James Muir, 19:138\nAllen, C.R. book review by, 19:258\nAllen, Patricia. book review by, 19:255\nThe Allen Site: A Paleoindian Camp in Southwestern Nebraska by Douglas B. Bamforth, ed., reviewed by Daniel S. Amick, 19:128\nAmerican Indians and the Law, N. Bruce Duthu, reviewed by David E. Wilkins, 19:249\nAmerican Indians and State Law: Sovereignty, Race, and Citizenship, 1790-1880, Deborah A. Rosen, reviewed by Kathryn E. Fort, 19:250\nAmick, Daniel S. book review by, 19:128\nAmmann, Klaus. See Gressel, Jonathan\n...\nWhyte, John D., ed. Moving Toward Justice: Legal Traditions and Aboriginal Justice, reviewed by Kelly LaRocca, 19:251\nWiegand, Shirley A., and Wayne A. Wiegand. Books on Trial: Red Scare in the Heartland, reviewed by Ahmed A. White, 19:138\nWiegand, Wayne A. See Wiegand, Shirley A.\nWildlife Science: Linking Ecological Theory and Management Applications, edited by Timothy E. Fulbright and David G. Hewitt, reviewed by C.R. Allen, 19:258\nWilkins, David E. book review by, 19:249\nWitmer, Richard C., II. See Corntassel, Jeff.\nYou, J. See Hubbard, K.G.\nZontek, Ken. book review by, 19:137
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".