MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094149829

Ray Heuchling

2019· article· W7094149829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVice presidentExecutive committeeExecutive directorExecutive boardTrade association
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Raymond J. Heuchling, a respected paper and pulp sales and marketing executive with 35 years of experience in the industry, is the Founder and President of The Heuchling Group, Inc., an organization dedicated to providing a broad range of consulting and trading services for growth-focused companies within the pulp and paper industry. Mr. Heuchling spent more than 30 years as an executive with New Brunswick, Canada-based Irving Forest Products. He played a major role in establishing the company’s first sales office in the United States. As Senior Vice President of Pulp and Paper Sales, he was responsible for Irving’s sales and marketing across the U.S., as well as the company’s business development activity. Dedicated to education and training to advance the industry, Mr. Heuchling has been an active member of the University of Maine Pulp and Paper Foundation for decades, serving on Public Relations Committee, the Executive Committee, and most recently as Chair of the Board. Mr. Heuchling served as a member of the Education and Training Committee of TAPPI, and a member of TAPPI’s Bio-Refining Committee. Mr. Heuchling is a past president of the Association of American Wood Pulp Importers, as well as a member of the Paper Industry International Hall of Fame. He is past president of the Paper Industry Management Association (PIMA), has served on the PIMA board of directors, and was chairman of the PIMA Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207