Nouveaux regards sur Charleville : Histoire, population et territoire (XVIIe-XIXe siècle) New perspectives on Charleville: History, population and territory (17th-19th century)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 2 avril 2005, lors du colloque du cinquantenaire de la Société d’études ardennaises, François-Joseph Ruggiu proposait une communication intitulée Pour une histoire de Charleville et de sa population sous l’Ancien Régime. Il venait d’ouvrir un champ d’études et de sources inédites dont personne ne soupçonnait alors l’importance et les multiples dimensions historiques qui allaient en découler. En décembre 2010, un premier colloque intitulé Charleville, une ville neuve et sa population s’est tenu pour mettre en lumière l’histoire de la population de Charleville et ces sources exceptionnelles, en France et en Europe, que sont les dénombrements annuels de population de la ville. Les 28 et 29 mai 2021, un second rendez-vous scientifique international aura pour but de proposer un nouveau point d’étape sur ce projet et de mettre en lumière les travaux innovants qui se focalisent actuellement sur l’histoire de la cité ardennaise, dans une perspective de longue durée et à travers de multiples domaines de recherche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".