Building a Counterarchive: A Response to Cristina Iuliâs âTrans-Atlantic American Studies and the Transatlantic Pedagogies: Some Methodological Perspectives and Questionsâ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some Methodological Perspectives and Questions" C ristina Iuli's paper "Figuring Atlantic Legacies" is a well- documented, comprehensive analysis of the theoretical, philosophical and critical debate that has steadily been growing around the subject of Transatlantic Studies in the past twenty years or so.In her systematic reconstruction of the various articulations that such a comprehensive field of research has so far experienced, the author has not merely limited herself to account for its major transformations and to explore their specific impact upon the international scholarly scene, but in so doing, she has also traced her own personal route by singling out, among the large variety of critical views currently available, a number of inspiring references to guide her safely in her own Transatlantic crossing.This has resulted in a spirited intertextual dialogue with some of the best known, seminal works that have helped opening entirely new perspectives to students of the Atlantic world-a rich exchange of critical hypotheses and opinions that are here combined in a particularly lively-and certainly very useful-fashion.From the innovative outlook of Black and Neo-Atlanticism, to Roach's and Baucom's Circum-Atlantic perspective and on to the global view of Trans-Atlantic studies, all of the most relevant stages of the decolonization process that has inspired the evolution of transnational American studies are followed closely in their numerous and subsequent variations.As the author makes clear since the opening paragraphs of her essay, the emergence of an explicitly transnational and intercultural perspective, and the disposal of both the "colonial difference," FEATURES
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".