Cоціальне партнерство «школа - родина - громада»у запобіганні насиллю над жінками та дівчатами в Канаді(Social partnership «school - family - community» in violence against women and girls prevention in Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Мета статті - проаналізувати специфіку соціального партнерства школа — родина - громада в профілактиці та подоланні насилля над представницями жіночої статі в Канаді. Розкрито основні форми, у яких реалізовується така співпраця. Наведено приклади навчальних програм, які діють на базі шкіл за участі батьків учнів, місцевих громад. Представлено напрацювання канадських громадських організацій щодо просвіти учнівської молоді з питань насилля над жінками і дівчатами. (The purpose of this article is to analyze the peculiarities of social partnership school - family - community, aimed at prevention and eradication of violence against women and girlsin Canada. The major forms of this cooperation have been examined. Examples of school programmes which function with the participation of school students’ parents and community members have been illustrated. The projectsof Canadian community organizations, targeted at raising awareness of the school youth regarding the issue of violence against women, have been presented.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".