MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094709330

Review of <i> Cather Studies 4: Willa Cather's Canadian and\nOld World Connections</i> Edited by Robert Thacker\nand Michael A. Peterman

2001· article· W7094709330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2001
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipPublishingCraftJournalismConsciousnessCanadian studies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Willa Cather's Canadian and Old World Connections is the first of four new collections that have emerged from international colloquia held in different locales of Cather's work. To those whose Cather is primarily a Nebraska writer, they may provide a jolt. Nevertheless, Willa Cather now not only belongs to the world but is also being claimed by a growing number of its corners: first Quebec; then Pittsburgh; then Winchester, Virginia; later New York City; and, most recently, the Southwest. One explanation for the exponential growth in Cather scholarship is, in fact, these geographical pulls which position her newly and thus undermine critical orthodoxy. In any case, Cather scholars enjoy talking about her in various parts of the world, so there's hope the consciousness of her own wide travels will continue to produce new critical collections.\nWhen one reads such a collection she is, of course, aware of how personal her responses are to particular essays. What one likes best are those that push her either to go a little further down a dimly-glimpsed trail or else to return to a road not taken. In short, one prefers the welcome lift toward a place already calling, toward enjoyable tasks already imagined. Thus the essays most valuable to me may not be those most valuable to you. Having acknowledged the personal, I'd therefore like to salute here those pieces that left me smiling, like Cather's Cecile: "I am delighted at you!"\nDavid Stouck's astonishing lead essay, "Willa Cather's Canada," covers connections from Cather's schoolgirl journalism to her last published story. Stouck finds more Canada in Cather than anyone else could have imagined and grounds this book in provable fact. But where Stouck's reaching arms cover the country coast to coast, Deborah Lindsay Williams's "Losing Nothing, Comprehending Everything" unearths new strata by digging down into Death Comes for the Archbishop. Williams treats more inventively than anyone else the earth goddess materials placed here by Cather as her most dramatic contrast to Catholic Bishop Latour. It's a stellar essay. Two other provocative pieces open up important new interpretative possibilities. Klaus Stich's "The Professor's House: Prohibition, Ripe Grapes, and Euripides" puts Godfrey St. Peter in a Prohibition-pinched New Historical context that significantly redefines him. And Franyoise Palleau-Papin studies so lucidly the French rhythms, syntax, and linguistic syntheses in "The Hidden French in Cather's English" she ought to open up new frontiers for Cather studies.\nI should also mention gratefully four more writers among the many worthies in this collection. Richard Harris discovers a Pierre Charron in Montaigne's work, thereby providing a strong textual link between Cather and Montaigne-loving Emerson. Helen M. Buss's "Reading the Writer through Biographies and Memoirs," a joy to listen to when she first delivered it, remains a joy to read. Richard Millington reads Shadows on the Rock through the lens of cultural anthropology, reminding us how attuned Cather was to the thought of her time. And Nadeane Trowse's concentration on "Disease, Doctors, and Diagnoses as Social Action" provokes studies of Cather and medicine soon to appear. All in all, this collection beckons one to "come and buy."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.015
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsecta mundiSame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207