MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095002004 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17442631

Cheilosia (Convocheila) cumanica Szilady 1938

2025· article· W7095002004 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubgenusSetaScutellumDorsumPeck (Imperial)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cheilosia (Convocheila) cumanica Szilády, 1938 Fig. 25 Cheilosia cumanica Szilády, 1938: 143. Cheilosia verae Stackelberg, 1968: 229. Syn. with Cheilosia cumanica by Brădescu (1991). Cheilosia verae – Stackelberg & Richter 1968: 249. — Stackelberg 1970: 62. — Peck 1988: 119. — Barkalov 1993: 712. — Barkalov & Mutin 2018: 484. Cheilosia verae Stackelberg, 1956 [sic] – Gujabidze 2002: 246. Cheilosia cumanica – Mengual et al. 2020: 22. Differential diagnosis Cheilosia cumanica belongs to the subgenus Convocheila Barkalov, 2002. One of the distinctive characters of the subgenus is the pilosity on the face: long pilose along paraface in dorsal one third of face. In the males of Convocheila the ventral lobe of the postgonite is sickle-shaped. Within the Caucasus, the only other member of the subgenus Convocheila is C. laticornis, and the male of C. cumanica can be easily distinguished from C. laticornis by the pilose eye (bare in C. laticornis), the female has few long black pile on the occiput, besides long yellow pile (with only long yellow pile in C. laticornis) and scutellum on posterior margin with robust black setae (with weak, yellow setae in C. laticornis). The male genitalia of C. cumanica are figured in Radenković et al. (2020). Material examined Collected in 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023; see Mengual et al. (2020) for detailed records from 2018. Genetics All DNA barcodes of C. cumanica are recovered together with high support value (BS = 100%). Remarks In the Caucasus, this taxon is often reported under the name C. verae, but Brădescu (1991) synonymized C. verae under C. cumanica. Our genetic results (Supp. file 1: Fig. S1) support this synonymy as specimens from the Caucasus cluster together with specimens from Serbia. Biology During our expeditions, collected between 2 May and 19 July at an altitude between 625 and 2700 m a.s.l. Most common on alpine meadows where it feeds on the flowers of herbaceous plants. Distribution Balkan Peninsula, Carpathian Mountains, Iran, and Caucasus (Armenia, Georgia, Russia).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207