MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095192834

SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF FARMED COD (GADUSMORHUA)

2014· article· en· W7095192834 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtlantic codCod fisheriesCapelinGadusFish <Actinopterygii>Fish meal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) is an important source of income for the fishermen and processors in Maritimes and Newfoundland. Depletion of cod stocks, particularly in the Grand Banks, has prompted the Federal Government to introduce a two-year moratorium in certain areas. Sea Forest Plantation has initiated a cod-farming operation in several locations in Newfoundland. Undersized cod from inshore trap fishery during June-August are transported to holding pens by boat. They are then fed intensively on live or frozen capelin or on pelleted feed formulations. The intensively fed cod generally grow at a much faster rate than wild cod. The high growth rates obtainable in holding pens are due to higher temperature in the shallow waters and the feeding regimes. Although cod may be relatively easily bred and grown to a marketable size in approximately two years, the high cost of raising fish up to approximately 500 g size makes the operation uneconomical at current prices. Harvesting of farmed cod generally begins in December and may continue until January-February. They may be sold as prime fish fillets in the U.S. and Canadian markets or could be frozen in special custom-designed packages. The present paper reports on changes in the chemical composition and characteristics of pen-held cod over a 20-week period during intensive feeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOral History, Memory, Narrative AnalysisFrench-language works237,207