ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RADIO DRAMA: A COMPARISON OF CENTRAL & REGIONAL PRODUCTION UNITS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comparison of the work of two radio drama producers, Andrew Allan (Toronto) and Rupert Caplan (Montreal), between 194 1 and 1%1. The two are taken to represent distinct creative formations examined in relation to the complex of production elements in the context of the tensions between region and centre in Canada. Nous comparons les ouevres de deux realisateurs de dramatiques radiophoniques, celles du torontois Andrew Allan avec celles du montrealais Rupert Caplan, entre 1941 et 1961. Nous analysons leur demarche crhtrice respective en fonction de la configuration des com-posantes de production dans le contexte des tensions entre le centre et la p6riphCrie au Canada. Andrew Allan and Rupert Caplan were two of the major producers of radio drama aired by the CRBC and the CBC between 1932 and 1961. Allan, who began his radio career as a writer and announcer in Toronto, joined the CBC in Vancouver as a drama producer during the early 1940's. In 1943 he returned to Toronto as National Drama Supervisor and, in this role, produced English-Canada's "National Theatre of the Air". Caplan began his radio career in 1931 as an actor in the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".