MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095345404

Landowner Habitat Stewardship Guide

2015· article· en· W7095345404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)HabitatWildlifeWork (physics)AcknowledgementWildlife corridorEnvironmental stewardshipHabitat destructionLand tenure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maintaining the ecological integrity and viability of the land is key for not only the landholders ’ livelihood, but also the wildlife habitat they manage or conserve. The “At Home on the Range Guide – Living with Alberta’s Prairie Species at Risk ” is a landholder friendly guide that discusses several ways in which landholders can enhance and maintain native habitat on their land. Most of Alberta’s species at risk fall under provincial jurisdiction. The success of MULTISAR can be attributed to the multi-species approach, voluntary collaboration, partnerships, and acknowledgement that many of these species still exist due to the conservation practices of landholders. At Home on the Range MULTISAR is a process for multi-species conservation at the landscape level. In 2007 MULTISAR expanded to the grasslands of Alberta and will continue to work collaboratively with landholders as part of MULTISAR’s awareness and education campaign (www.multisar.ca). An important tool for MULTISAR’s awareness and education campaign is the “At Home on the Range – Living with Alberta’s Prairie Species at Risk ” guide. “At Home on the Range ” is a landholder friendly guide that discusses several ways in which landholders can enhance and maintain native habitat on their land. The guide starts with a brief introduction on Alberta’s grasslands before starting into Species at Risk 101, which looks at who, what, where, why and how certain species came to be at risk. The second chapter looks at the implications (good and bad) of having species at risk on your land and the rest of the guide contains positive practices that can benefit species at risk and their habitat. The “At Home on the Range ” guide also contains a mini-guide within entitled “Over and Under the Range”, which describes the importance of maintaining the ecological integrity of the range to not only benefit wildlife, but also soil stabilization, weed control, water filtration, nutrient buildup, and ultimately provide long-term economic returns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4130.205

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Conservation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207