MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095436090

Maximilian Hell’s invitation to Norway

2008· article· en· W7095436090 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHistory and Developments in Astronomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServantSettlement (finance)The arcticFalling (accident)Spring (device)Quarter (Canadian coin)Procession
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

servatory to embark upon a strenuous journey to the extreme north-eastern corner of Norway. He brought with him a massive array of scientific equipment, including a 6 feet gnomon, two pendulum clocks, quadrants 2 14 and 6 feet in diameter, telescopes 10, 10 12, and 8 1 2 feet long, mural telescopes, micrometers, barometers, thermometers, declinometers, an electric machine, at least one mi-croscope, as well as equipment for mounting and repairing these instruments (Hell 1770a; ArchS 1a; 1b). In addition came a number of books, heaps of paper, pens, ink, olive oil, chocolate, wine, coffee, tea, and other necessities of the urban savant. All this had to be brought along by ship and wagon, partly from Vienna, partly from Copenhagen, Christiania, and Trondheim, to the des-tination Vardø, a small settlement close by the Arctic Ocean. Two scientific assistants (as well as a servant and a dog) were Hell’s travel companions for most of the journey. When he finally reached Vardø on 11thOctober, in the midst of a storm which nearly drove his ship away to be lost forever in the merciless Eismeer, Father Hell had been travelling indefatigably for almost six months. Nevertheless, he immediately started constructing a modest observa-tory into which he would bring all his equipment and spend most of the winter and spring doing research in multiple disciplines. On his way back, Hell stopped in Copenhagen for several months, presenting the main results of his expedition. Not until 12thAugust 1770 did he return to Vienna (ArchS 1c). The entire expedition was financed by the authorities in Copenhagen, and Hell had been invited in the name of the King himself. But why, one may ask, did a world-famous astronomer leave his high standard observatory in Vienna to go to a remote corner of the civilised world? And how did it come about that he, a Jesuit, was invited, and sponsored, by the Protestant King of Denmark and Norway, whose laws forbade the presence of Jesuits? The key to answer both these questions lies in the 18th-century transits of Venus. On 5thJune 1761 and 3rdJune 1769, the planet Venus passed in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2220.119

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistory and Developments in AstronomyFrench-language works237,207