Comparison of the Molecular Genotypes of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from the Hides of Beef Cattle in Different Regions of
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cattle hides become contaminated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 via pathogen transmission in the feedlot, during trans-port, and while in the lairage environment at the processing facility, and the bacteria can be transferred to beef carcasses during processing. Several studies have shown that E. coli O157:H7 strains possessing indistinguishable restriction digest patterns (RDPs) can be isolated from distant locations. Most of these studies, however, examined RDPs from strains isolated within a single region of the United States or Canada. The experiment described in the present study was designed to identify the molecular genotypes of E. coli O157:H7 isolates from beef cattle hides in nine major cattle-producing regions of North America. Prevalence for E. coli O157:H7 in beef cattle hide samples ranged from 9 to 85%. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of XbaI-digested genomic DNA from 1,193 E. coli O157:H7 isolates resulted in 277 unique RDPs. Of the 277 unique XbaI RDPs, 54 contained isolates collected from multiple regions. After two subsequent rounds of PFGE analysis (BlnI and SpeI), there were still many isolates (n 154) that could not be distinguished from others, even though they were collected from different regions separated by large geographical distances. On multiple occasions, strains isolated from cattle hides in Canada had RDPs that were indistinguishable after three enzyme digestions from cattle hide isolates collected in Kansas and Nebraska. This information clearly shows that strains with indistinguishable RDPs originate from multiple sources that can be separated by large distances and that this should be taken into account when the source tracking of isolates is
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".