Bibliographic record
Abstract
Defence Services Procurement Project 00002199 tasked DREO to test the new Siemens EPD Mk2 (an electronic personal dosimeter) at DREO's various irradiation facilities. The dependence of the response on dose rate, energy, and temperature were all studied. This dosimeter was found to be comparable to the DMC 2000S electronic dosimeter produced by Merlin-Guerin Products (MGP), although each has some particular advantages over the other. This dosimeter is an appropriate product for use as an electronic dosimeter by the Canadian Forces in a wide variety of radiation fields. RESUME Le Projet de Procurement de Services pour la Defense 00002199, a fait la demande ä CRDO d'evaluer les dosimetres personnels electroniques Siemens EPD Mk2. La reaction des EPD en ce qui concerne la dependance sur le debit de dose, l'energie de rayonnement et la temperature a ete evaluee. La performance de ces dosimetres est comparable aux dosimetres electroniques DMC 2000S, fabrique par Merlin-Guerin Products (MGP). Cependant, chacun possede quelques avantages particuliers par rapport ä l'autre. Le dosimetre Siemens EPD Mk2 est un produit bien adapte pour l'usage comme dosimetre electronique par les forces canadiennes dans une grande variete de champs de rayonnement. in EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background: DREO continues to provide scientific and technical services to Defence
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".