Bibliographic record
Abstract
mackerel stock is continuing its expansion which began in 1981. Nominal catch rose from 39,000 mt in 1984 to 57,000 mt in 1985 and the USA domestic fishery harvested 6,700 mt, the eighth increase in a row. Current information suggests that the 1981, 1982 and 1984 year classes are all above average in strength and contributing heavily to the fishery. Present stock size from VPA 1s approximately 1.5 million mt and the spawning stock is about 1.3 million tons. Catch projections _u~der an FO.1 management strategy produce an expected catch of 285-334 thousand mt depending on recruitment assumptions used. A 1986 catch of 50-60 thousand mt will produce an increase in spawning stock in 1987, even under a conservative projection of recruitment from the 1983 and 1984 year classes.-2-NOMINAL CATCH Nominal catches of Atlantic mackerel rose 44 % in 1985, increasing from 39,445 mt in 1984. to 56,997 mt (Table 1). After a period of stable landings (1978-1983) catches have increased in the last two years. The increase is due primarily to joint venture catches by countries other than the US and Canada, including GOR (19%) and the Netherlands (26%) who accounted for 26,010 mt; 46% of the total. Overall landings from the mackerel stock are still small compared to the aggregate international catches that occurred from 1969-1976 in'the Mid-Atlantic area, ~ut all available information indicates that landings will continue to increase in the future, contingeni on interest, speci fi c management and regul ati on. The USA commercial catch has increased in every year since 1977 and accounted for about 12 % of the total catch in 1985 (Table 1). USA commercial landings were 6,697 mt in 1985, a 13 % increase over 1984. The estimated Canadian catch of 16,590 mt for 1985 is similar to the amount landed the previous year (Table 1). The Northeast Fisheries Center continued to conduct a cooperative research fishery with Poland in 1985 resulting in a total ' 'of 6,200 mt. CONTRIBUTION OF RECENT YEAR CLASSES
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.678 | 0.512 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".