� 1999, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc. Restoration of the food web of an alpine lake following fish stocking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trout stocking in the mid-1960s eliminated the calanoid copepod Hesperodiaptomus arcticus and other largebodied crustaceans such as Gammarus lacustris, Daphnia middendorffiana, and Daphnia pulex from many alpine lakes in the Rocky Mountain Parks of Canada. H. arcticus frequently dominates the plankton communities of fishless lakes, preying on rotifers and nauplius larvae. Following the extirpation of H. arcticus, rotifers and small-bodied cyclopoid copepods dominate the zooplankton assemblages of alpine lakes. We studied the zooplankton community of Snowflake Lake, Banff National Park, from 1966 to 1995. H. arcticus was eliminated following stocking of the lake with trout in the 1960s. It failed to become reestablished after the disappearance of the fish population in the mid-1980s. Several species of rotifers and small-bodied crustaceans, species originally rare or absent from the plankton, became abundant following fish stocking and remained so after the fish population declined. In 1992, we reintroduced H. arcticus to Snowflake Lake. The H. arcticus population grew exponentially for 4 yr, but had not reached stable densities typical of unmanipulated alpine lakes by 1995. By 1994, however, even the small population of Hesperodiaptomus was beginning to suppress populations of rotifers, copepod nauplii, and large diatoms. Because H. arcticus is omnivorous, a simple model of cascading trophic interactions did not predict the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.322 | 0.355 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".