MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096082927

Prevent n of pzj!can €t iOI~%prOgram FROM: k-stephen D. age!!/:::jtor. r t Office of A'I Quality Planning and Standards

2010· article· en· W7096082927 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational Ambient Air Quality StandardsQuality (philosophy)Quarter (Canadian coin)Clean Air Act
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S02 NAAQS or 1-hour S02 standard) of75 ppb, which is attained when the 3-year average of the annual 99th-percentile of I-hour daily maximum concentrations does not exceed 75 ppb at each monitor within an area. EPA revised the primary S02 NAAQS to provide the requisite protection of public health. The final rule for the new I-hour S02 NAAQS was published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2010 (75 FR 35520), and the standard becomes effective on August 23,2010. In the same notice, we also announced that we are revoking both the existing 24-hour and annual primary S02 standards. However, as explained in this guidance, those S02 standards, as well as the 24-hour and annual increments for S02, remain in effect for a while further and must continue to be protected. EP A interprets the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions of the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations to require that any federal permit issued under 40 CFR 52.21 on or after that effective date must contain a demonstration of source compliance with the new I-hour S02 NAAQS. We anticipate that some new major stationary sources or major modifications, especially those involving relatively short stacks, may experience difficulty demonstrating that emissions from proposed projects will not cause or contribute to a modeled violation of the new

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6630.508

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→