Item 5.1 on the provisional agenda* ECOSYSTEM APPROACH: FURTHER ELABORATION, GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND RELATIONSHIP WITH SUSTAINABLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Note by the Executive Secretary 1. Further to his note on the ecosystem approach: further elaboration, guidelines for implementation and relationship with sustainable forest management (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/9/8), the Executive Secretary is circulating herewith, for the information of participants in the ninth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA), the complete report of the Expert Meeting on the Ecosystem Approach, held in Montreal from 7 to 11 July 2003. The report includes an introduction, a procedural report and the main conclusions of the Expert Meeting. It also includes two substantive annexes: (a) Annex I, which enlarges upon annex I of the above-mentioned note by the Executive Secretary by including case-studies to illustrate the application of the ecosystem approach; and (b) Annex II, which contains a consideration of the relationship between sustainable forest management and the ecosystem approach, as well as a review and development of strategies for, the integration of the ecosystem approach into the programmes of work of the Convention. This annex incorporates comments received from participants in the Expert Meeting on the equivalent text in annex I to the note by the Executive Secretary. 2. The report is available in English only. * UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/9/1. For reasons of economy, this document is printed in a limited number. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copiesUNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/9/INF/4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.070 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.039 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.126 | 0.148 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".