2000b), “From School to Work: The Evolution of Early Labour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article rapporte les résultats d’une analyse empirique des effets immédiats sur le marché du travail pour les canadiens ayant un diplôme post-secondaire. Cette analyse est basée sur les National Graduates Surveys qui représent ceux qui ont terminé des programmes collégiaux ou universitaires en 1982, 1986 et 1990. Parmi les résultats principaux, nous trouvons que les diplômés de niveau post-secondaire se portent générale-ment assez bien, lorsque le groupe est pris dans son ensemble; la plupart des diplômés se trouvent un emploi à temps plein et permanent, reçoivent des salaires raisonnablement élevés, et se retrouvent sur le marché du travail avec succès selon les diverses mesures des résultats utilisées ici; la transition école-travail est claire-ment un processus, au lieu d’être un événement, avec la pluplart des résultats s’améliorant significativement de deux à cinq années après la graduation; ces résultats dépendent du niveau d’éducation (collégial, études universitaires de premier cycle, de deuxième cycle et de troisième cycle) et du sexe; et que les cohortes de diplômés successives n’ont pas fait l’expérience des déclins sur le marché du travail durant cette période. This paper reports the results of an empirical analysis of the early labour market outcomes of Canadian postsecondary graduates based on the National Graduates Surveys, representing those who finished their college or university programs in 1982, 1986, and 1990. The major findings include that postsecondary graduates have generally been doing quite well as a group, with most finding full-time and permanent jobs,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".