MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096410623

Activities, International

2015· article· en· W7096410623 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTuberculosisInternational ActionDeveloped countryGovernment (linguistics)Psychological interventionDeveloping countryIntervention (counseling)Epidemiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article has been peer reviewed. CMAJ 2000;162(1):57-61 CMAJ • JAN. 11, 2000; 162 (1) 57 © 2000 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors The burden of tuberculosis (TB) today is greatest in low-income countries:over 90 % of all cases arise there, and over 95 % of deaths from the diseaseoccur there;1 moreover, a high and increasing proportion of cases in many industrialized countries occur in people who were born and became infected in low-income countries, before they moved to the country where their TB has been de-tected.2 The horrendous impact of the HIV epidemic, including its pathophysiologi-cal, clinical and epidemiological interaction with TB,3 has been most evident in sub-Saharan Africa (particularly eastern and southern Africa) and is rapidly becom-ing apparent in India and Thailand. Estimates of the global impact of TB indicate that TB is the most frequent cause of death in the world from a single agent in young adults1 and that at least 20 million people have died unnecessarily of this dis-ease in the past decade. These facts necessitate international collaboration in inter-ventions to deal with TB. In this paper I present an overview of global interventions to eliminate TB, focusing in particular on the roles of scientific and technical ex-perts, government agencies, and voluntary associations in these cooperative efforts. The objective of intervention To be effective, global action on TB must have clear objectives. Ultimately, the aim of any interventions should be elimination of the disease. Global elimination of an infectious disease has been achieved only once before, for smallpox, but there are divergent views as to whether this goal can be accomplished for TB. The following characteristics facilitated the elimination of smallpox: an effective vaccination strategy, no natural reservoir outside humans and no carrier state for the virus. TB does not have these characteristics. Instead, the prevention strategy is based on case management, there are animal reservoirs of the bacteria and most in-fected people carry viable bacilli without symptoms. On what grounds, then, can we hope that TB can be eliminated?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5730.395

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→