What the Historic Record Reveals about Bodie’s Peak Population By
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current literature offers various opinions about the number of people who swarmed into boomtown Bodie. Most modern-day pundits claim the uproarious mining town’s population exceeded 10,000. Others say 12,000, or even 15,000 restless souls once occupied the place.(1) The historic record, however, reveals that fewer people lived in Bodie than mythmakers and witless writers have led us to believe. Immediately before hordes of disappointed fortune seekers began departing in mid- to late 1880, most eyewitnesses estimated the town’s population at 8,000 or fewer. Their remarks are preserved in surviving newspapers. One journalist approximated Bodie’s population in late 1879 while grumbling about muddy streets. “It is rather a humiliating confession to make that in a town of 8,000 inhabitants, in the principal street, and in front of the principal stores, a wagon should mire down.... ” (Bodie Morning News 5 September 1879) Twenty days later, another newspaper published a letter praising the camp: “Two producing mines sustain a population close on 10,000 people.... ” (Daily Bodie Standard 25 September 1879) A conflicting opinion appeared three weeks later: “The people, we are glad to know, are awakening to the necessity of having some settled form of [government] by which the various civil and criminal wants of a people, now numbering nearly 7,000 souls, can be supplied. ” (Bodie Morning News 16 October 1879) Meanwhile, Bodie’s press championed the district by telegraphing promotional tidbits to newspapers throughout the West:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".