Canadian Journal o f Counsel l ing I Revue canadienne de counseling I 2001, V o l. 35:3 237 A Portrait of Counselling: Counsellors ' Work Roles and Career Satisfaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports on a survey of counsellors who graduated from a Masters-level counsel-lor education program at a central-Canadian university. Within the context of a larger program evaluation, counsellors were asked to provide information about their work set-tings, professional activities, and clientele. They also provided information about how satisfied they are with several aspects of their careers in counselling. These data provide a portrait of counselling in the local community as a vibrant, dynamic profession adapting to the ever-changing social, political, and cultural context. RÉSUMÉ Cet article analyse les résultats d'un sondage effectué auprès de conseillers ayant reçu une maîtrise d'un programme de formation en counseling, offert par une université du Canada central. Dans le cadre d'une évaluation plus approfondie du programme, on a demandé aux conseillers de fournir des renseignements sur leur milieu de travail, leurs activités professionnelles ainsi que leur clientèle. Ces conseillers ont également été interrogés sur leur niveau de satisfaction au sujet de plusieurs aspects de leur carrière de
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".