CAOT Lexicon / Lexique de l’ACE Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists • Association canadienne des ergothérapeutes • www.caot.ca © CAOT/ACE 2011 1 INDEX- CAOT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ACOTRO- Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy Regulatory Organizations ACORE- Association canadienne des organismes de réglementation en ergothérapie Adapt, enablement skill Adapter, Habiletés en habilitation (Sens légal) Administrative benchmarks Repères administratifs (Notion d'étalon), Cibles administratives (Reddition de compte- organisationnelle) Advocate (verb), Advocate (noun) Revendiquer (verbe), Défenseur des intérêts (nom) Advocate for themselves Défendre ses propres intérêts / Revendiquer pour soi-même Advocacy Advocacy, Plaidoyer pour une cause ou une personne Age, occupational therapists Âge, ergothérapeutes Agency, agency to act Agence / Organisme, l'agir (processus) Agree on objectives/plan, (CPPF action point) Convenir des objectifs / du plan, (étape du MCPP) Alliances, allies Alliances/coalitions/partenariats, partenaires/alliés Appreciative narrative inquiry, appreciative inquiry (AI) Approche narrative centrée sur les forces, interrogation appréciative (IA) Assess/evaluate, (CPPF action point) Évaluer/Analyser, (étape du MCPP) Asset-based practice, appreciative inquiry (AI) Pratique centrée sur les forces, interrogation appréciative (IA) Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy University Programs (ACOTUP) Association canadienne des programmes universitaires en ergothérapie (ACPUE) Attribution theories Théorie de l'attribution causale
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it