MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096819360

Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY The Factors Affecting on the World Prices of the Most Important Agricultural Commodities and their Effects on the Egyptian Domestic Prices

2015· article· en· W7096819360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture, Water, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScarcityProduction (economics)AgricultureCropExploitAgricultural productivity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The most important results of the study are represented in that the world prices of wheat are affected by some factors. The most important of these factors are America’s export price of wheat, Russia’s export price of wheat and Canada’s production of ethanol. However, the most important factors affecting on corn crop are represented in the amount of the global exports of the crop, America’s export price of the crop, France’s export crop of the crop and France’s production of ethanol. Finally, for soybeans, the most important factors are represented in America’s export price, Brazil’s export price and the amount of the global exports of soybeans. The study found, also, that the rise in the world prices of the three crops leads to an increase in their domestic prices and a rise in their import prices. Finally, it is shown that the rise in the import prices of these commodities leads to a rise in the prices of the local production and a rise in the Egyptian import bill. Thus, the most important recommendations of the study are confined in two trends. The first trends are represented in the vertical expansion through the produce high productive varieties and circulate them through activating the role of the agricultural guides. However, the second trend is represented in the horizontal expansion which is faced by a lot of obstacles foremost the problem of water scarcity in Egypt. Here, the state shall adopt two trends whether to activate the Egyptian-Sudanese relation and exploit the Egyptian expertise in cultivating the untapped areas in Sudan or reconsider, seriously, Congo River project which may results in providing about 95 billion cubic meters of water annually for Egypt. This amount of water can be exploited in reclaiming the lands suitable for reclamation and exploiting them in agriculture and thus the problem of the Renaissance Dam can be

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5760.441

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgriculture, Water, and HealthFrench-language works237,207