MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096853298

© 2014 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors CMAJ 1

2016· article· en· W7096853298 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChokingDysphagiaSwallowingRetrospective cohort studyBleedSore throatCohortIntubationGastrointestinal bleeding
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 81-year-old man with a history of cor onary artery disease experienced a sudden choking feeling, sore throat, difficulty swallowing and itchy mouth immedi-ately after finishing dinner. He was taking clo-pidogrel 75 mg combined with 100 mg acetyl-salicylic acid once daily, and metoprolol tartrate 50 mg twice daily for secondary prevention fol-lowing stent implantation 12 months earlier. On examination in the emergency department, a round dark-coloured structure resembling a for-eign body was observed at the back of his mouth. Laryngoscopy identified an enlarged and bruised uvula (Figure 1). Hematocrit, plate-let count and activated thromboplastin time were normal. We diagnosed uvula hematoma, and advised the patient to stop antiplatelet treat-ment and to avoid swallowing hard food. The hematoma disappeared gradually within three weeks, and there was no recurrence after he started monotherapy with acetylsalicylic acid. Dual antiplatelet therapy has been associ-ated with bleeding in 3 % of patients during the first six months of treatment and in 5.5 % of patients by the end of the first year.1 In a large retrospective cohort study, the rate of major bleeding at 30 days of treatment, defined as intracranial bleeding or bleeding associated with a hematocrit decrease of at least 15%, was estimated at 14.3 per 100 person-years.2 Risk factors for major bleeds include age greater than 75 years, liver disease, gastrointestinal disease and prior stroke.3 The most common sites of bleeding are gastrointestinal, intracra-nial and urinary.4 In some cases, treatment may require intravenous fluids, transfusion, anti-fibrinolytics and, rarely, surgical or endoscopic procedures.4 Caution is warranted in stopping both antiplatelet agents, because this has been associated with an increase in major cardiovas-cular events.4 Uvula hematoma has been previously de scribed in relation to streptokinase therapy and endotracheal intubation.5 Our patient’s hema-toma could have been precipitated by trauma related to eating hard crackers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8830.209

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Malpractice and Liability IssuesFrench-language works237,207