MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096916803

Ontario,

2010· article· en· W7096916803 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemimartingaleNonparametric statisticsParametric statisticsBounded functionBounded variationParametric modelMathematical proofFunction (biology)Discrete time and continuous time
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper extends a result of Godambe on parametric estimation for discrete time stochastic processes to nonparametric estimation for the continuous time case. Following Hasminskii and Ibragimov (1980), the nonparametric problem is formulated as a parametric one but with infinite dimensional parameter. Let { P} be a family of probability measures such that (D,F,P) is complete, (Ft,t~O) is a standard filtration, and X=(XI,FI,t~O) is a semimartingale for every P £ { P}. For a parameter O'(t) suppose Xl=V, 0+ Aft 0 where the Vo process is predictable and locally of bounded variation and the H ~ proc~ss is a local martingale. Consider estimating equations for O'(t) of the form t Jau,adMu,o=O where the ao- process is predictable. Under regularity conditions, an o optimal form for a o in the sense of Godambe (Ann. Math. Statist. 31 (1960), 1208-11) is determined. The method is applied to cases where M is linear in 0'. It is shown that Nelson-Aalen estimate for the cumulative hazard function is optimal in Godambe's sense. A new estimate is obtained for an extended gamma process model. Semimartingale theory is used to indicate proofs of asymptotic normality of test statistics under the null hypotheses considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207