MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096951607

in preparation

2000· article· en· W7096951607 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil shaleHabitatWest virginiaNational parkPredatorWillow
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The butterfly reintroduction project was proposed in a biological assessment of the Shale Barren Rock Cress (Nott 2006) and other species endemic to the rare shale barren habitats of the Appalachians. Since the mid to late 1980’s two species of butterfly, the Grizzled Skipper (Pyrgus Wyandot) and Olympia Marble (Euchloe olympia) have been extirpated from many West Virginia shale barrens, including the Little Fork shale barren that lies within the stewardship of NIOC Sugar Grove, West Virginia. The report, submitted to NIOC Sugar Grove and the West Virginia Department of Natural Resources, concluded that these two species should be reintroduced to the shale barrens, and that the use of pesticides to control Gypsy Moth eruptions should not be permitted in the vicinity of shale barrens. The Little Fork shale barren provides an ideal location for reintroduction because a) access to high security DoD installations is extremely limited, b) Grizzled Skipper larvae feed exclusively on Canada Cinquefoil (Potentilla canadiensis) which appears to benefit from minimally invasive management of the trails and open clearings adjacent to the barren, and c) Forest Service pesticide spraying can be controlled not to impact the barren and adjacent habitat. 2008 Field Season

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207