MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096996222

TITLE: Antivirals for Pandemic Influenza: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

2010· article· en· W7096996222 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZanamivirOseltamivirNeuraminidasePandemicHuman mortality from H5N1Transmission and infection of H5N1Neuraminidase inhibitorInfluenza A virus subtype H5N1
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pandemic influenza is defined as a new strain of influenza that spreads quickly globally. 1 The strain is carried and transmitted among humans, who have little or no immunity against, and it typically spreads by breathing droplets or direct contact with an infected human or contaminated surface. 1 Since 1997, influenza A (H5N1) viruses have been detected in poultry and isolated cases among humans. 2 As of June 2009, a total of 433 human cases have been confirmed in Asia and Africa. 3 The threat of a H5N1 influenza remains. 2 In March 2009, the H1N1 virus, a newly isolated strain of influenza A was identified. Following the June 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak, the World Health Organization declared it a global pandemic, and H1N1 continues to spread around the world. 4 In Canada, amantadine and the neuraminidase inhibitors are available for the prophylaxis and treatment of influenza. Amantadine, however, is not active against influenza H5N1. 5 The neuraminidase inhibitors available in Canada include oseltamivir oral (Tamiflu®, Roche) and zanamivir inhalation (Relenza®, GlaxoSmithKline). 6-8 Oseltamivir is not approved for use in children under the age of one 9 and zanamivir is not approved for use in children less than seven years old. 10

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→