MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097123878

A systematic approach to analyse health-related quality o f life in multiple sclerosis: the GEDMA study

2016· article· en· W7097123878 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortQuality of life (healthcare)Multiple sclerosisCohort studySample (material)Quarter (Canadian coin)Longitudinal study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To descr ibe a ho listic and comprehensive approach to the assessment of sufferer ’s perceptio ns o f health-r elated quality of life (HRQ oL) in a cohor t of multiple sclero sis (MS) patients. Methods: The GEDMA (G rupo de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes de Madrid, in Spanish) study is an ongo ing longitudinal survey using quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The baseline cohort consisted of a large sample o f MS patients recruited from 13 hospitals in Madr id, Spain. Using a standardized protocol we collected data concerning the sociodemographic and health status character istics o f patients, as well as implementing a modified Spanish version of the Functio nal A ssessment of Multiple Sclerosis quality of life instrument. Pr imary caregivers were interviewed using a specific pro toco l combined with the Zarit Burden Inter view. Results: The index cohort comprised 371 MS patients (68.7 % female) o f mean age 38.99/0.9 years. A ge, sex and clinical form distr ibution were similar to o ther MS population-based surveys. There were 258 (69.5%) relapsing¡/remitting (RR) MS patients and 113 (30.5%) progressive MS patients. More than one-thir d of the married patients with progressive MS and almost a quarter o f the RRMS patients separated or divorced fo llowing a diagnosis of MS; 71.3 % of the progressive MS patients as well as 65.8 % of the RRMS patients were unemployed as a consequence of the disease. Q ualitative analysis showed that friendship and family relatio nships and occupational status were the most significant dimensions influenced by MS. O n the other hand, the speech analysis o f pr imary caregivers showed that emotional burden was related to patients ’ physical disability. Furthermore, pr imary caregivers descr ibed the influence of MS on their own occupatio nal status, their nonacceptance of the disease, a perceptio n of a lack of suppo rt by other members o f the family as

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.076
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.076
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0110.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.262
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→