VMPRlWFWAR Code: 2.13 No reprints Alpha status, dominance, and division of labor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The prevailing view of a wolf (Canis lupus) pack is that of a group of individuals ever vying for dominance nl but held in check by the "alpha " pair, the alpha male and alpha female. Most research on the social dynamics of wolf 63 % packs. however, has been conducted on non-natural assortments of captive wolves. Here I describe the wolf-pack social 2 GI-! order as it occurs In nature, discuss the alpha concept and social dominance and submission, and present data on the.! g precise relationships among members in free-living packs, based on a literature review and 13 summers of observations cn of wolves on Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. I conclude that the typical wolf pack is a family, with cn.PI 7 2.?I? the adult parents guiding the activities of the group in a division-of-labor system in which the female predominates.d primarily in such activities as pup care and defense and the male primarily during foraging and food-provisioning and the travels associated with them. RCsumi? : La notion genkralement acceptee d'une meute de Loups gris (Canis lupus) est celle d'un groupe d'individus qui convoitent continuellement la dominance mais qui voient leurs ambitions inhibees par le couple < ( alpha>>, le mile alpha et la femelle alpha. Cependant, la recherche sur la dynamique sociale des loups se fait generalement sur des groupes non naturels de loups en captivite. Je dkcris ici l'ordre social des meutes de loups en nature, j'examine le concept alpha, le concept de dominance sociale et de soumission et je presente des donnees sur 1es relations reelles entre les membres de meutes vivant en liberte d'apres une revision de la litterature et des observations directes de loups pendant 13 Ctes dans l'ile d'Ellesmere, Territoires du Nord-Ouest, Canada. J'ai conclu qu'une meute typique est
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.948 | 0.913 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".