Status: Member Body Contribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Request. This document asks for the disunification of a new *U+0242 LATIN SMALL LETTER GLOTTAL STOP from the existing U+0294 LATIN LETTER GLOTTAL STOP. It also asks for the deletion of the casepair relationship between U+0294 and U+0241 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER GLOTTAL STOP, and the addition of the case-pair relationship between U+0241 and the new *U+0242. (The asterisk is used to show that this character is not yet encoded.) If this proposal is adopted, the following three characters would exist: ¥ 0294 LATIN LETTER GLOTTAL STOP • caseless use in IPA and other phonetic notation (technical notation) • caseless use in Nootka, Nitinaht, Musqueam, Kootenai, Thompson (Canadian aboriginal orthographies) • does not have an uppercase equivalent x 0241 latin capital letter glottal stop x 0242 latin small letter glottal stop x 0C20 modifier letter glottal stop ∂ 0241 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER GLOTTAL STOP • casing use in Chipewyan, Dogrib, Slavey (Canadian aboriginal orthographies) • uppercase is 0242 latin small letter glottal stop x 0294 latin letter glottal stop x 0C20 modifier letter glottal stop ∑ 0242 LATIN SMALL LETTER GLOTTAL STOP • casing use in Chipewyan, Dogrib, Slavey (Canadian aboriginal orthographies) • uppercase is 0241 latin capital letter glottal stop x 0294 latin letter glottal stop x 0C20 modifier letter glottal stop with the following properties (including a change from Ll to Lo for U+0294):
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".