MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097302901

Performance Analysis of Precise Point Positioning Using Real-Time Orbit and Clock Products

2004· article· en· W7097302901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudorangePrecise Point PositioningGlobal Positioning SystemOrbit (dynamics)Flexibility (engineering)SatellitePrecision Lightweight GPS ReceiverPoint (geometry)Hybrid positioning system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The real-time availability of precise GPS satellite orbit and clock products has enabled the development of a novel positioning methodology known as precise point positioning (PPP). Based on the processing of un-differenced pseudorange and carrier phase observations from a single GPS receiver, positioning solutions with centimeter to decimeter accuracy can be attained globally. Such accuracy can currently be achieved only through differential processing of observations acquired simultaneously from at least two receiver stations. The potential impact of PPP on the positioning community is expected to be significant. It brings not only great flexibility to field operations but also reduces labor and equipment cost and simplifies operational logistics by eliminating the need for base stations. This paper will address issues related to precise point positioning and perform data analysis to assess the performance of different application solutions from PPP using real-time precise orbit and clock corrections. They include the discussion of an algorithm for un-differenced data processing, error source and mitigation, and critical elements related to real-time GPS orbit and clock products. Numerical results will be presented to show the positioning accuracy attained with datasets acquired from different environments using real-time precise orbit/clock products currently available. Features of a software package that has been developed at the University of Calgary for precise point positioning will also be described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207