MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097322834

Electronic Structure of Cerium Oxide Gate Dielectric Grown by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition Woo-Hee Kim,a,b W. J. Maeng,c Min-Kyu Kim,a Julien Gatineau,d,*

2016· article· en· W7097322834 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic layer depositionAnnealing (glass)Fermi levelAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Gate dielectricBand gapElectronic structureEllipsometryDielectricPhotoemission spectroscopy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have systematically investigated the electronic structure of CeO2 dielectric by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition (PE-ALD). The CeO2 films were deposited by using novel tris(isopropyl-cyclopentadienyl)cerium [Ce(iPrCp)3] precursor and O2 plasma. The energy band gap (3.48 eV), Fermi level (4.71 eV), and band offsets of PE-ALD CeO2 were elaborately determined by combining spectroscopic ellipsometry and ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy (UPS) techniques. In addition, based on the ex-perimental results of Fowler-Nordheim(F-N) tunneling and Poole-Frenkel(P-F) conduction for Al/PE-ALD CeO2/p-Si, the increased interfacial layer and reduced trapped oxide densities were found to be correlated to the increase in effective barrier height (0.89, 1.18 and 1.26 eV) and decrease in decreased trap energy levels (0.47, 0.26 and 0.18 eV) with increasing O2 annealing temperature (400, 600 and 800C), respectively. These discrepancies might be attributed to the thin film characteristics and oxygen vacancies in the CeO2 dielectrics, depending on the deposition techniques and post deposition annealing processes. VC 2011 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/1.3625611] All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207