Girth and Euclidean distortion / Random walks and Hilbert space compression- notes Probability, Geometry and Groups seminar, Toronto, 05.10.2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recall that for two metric spaces (X, d), Y, d ′ we say that a map f: X → Y is an embedding with distortion α if there exists a constant C> 0 such that: d(x, x ′ ) ≤ 1 C d ′ (f(x), f(x ′)) ≤ α d(x, x ′) for all x, x ′ ∈ X. The constant C represents a rescaling of the metric, so that simply rescaling all distances by a factor of C in X doesn’t incur any distortion, i.e. has α = 1. In particular for Y = ℓ 2 (with the standard norm, denoted by ‖ · ‖) we obtain the notion of a Euclidean embedding: f: X → ℓ 2 and the inequality: d(x, x ′ ) ≤ 1 C ‖f(x) − f(x ′) ‖ ≤ α d(x, x ′) The smallest α for which there exists an embedding into ℓ 2 with distortion α is called the Euclidean distortion of X and denoted by c2(X). We will prove the following bound for embeddings of regular graphs: Theorem 1.1 ([LMN02]). Let G be a finite d-regular graph, d ≥ 3, with girth g. Then the Euclidean distortion of G is Ω ( √ g). It is an open problem if this bound can be improved, for example to c2(G) = Ω(g). Note that for expanders on n vertices we have c2(G) = Ω(log n) and there exist expanders with girth Ω(log n), so at least in this case the bound is not tight. We will give a simple proof of this theorem employing the concept of the Markov type of a metric space. The paper [LMN02] contains also more refined results, using more involved techniques related to Poincaré-type inequalities on graphs. 1 Definition 1.2. We say that a metric space (X, d) has Markov type p if there exists a constant C> 0 such that for every reversible Markov Chain {Xn} ∞ n=0 on X, started in the stationary distribution, and every time T> 0 we have: E d(X0, XT) p ≥ C p T E d(X0, X1) p The best constant C that can be put on the right hand side is denoted by Mp(X) and we say that X has Markov type p with constant Mp(X). In other words, if a metric space has Markov type p, then any reversible random walk on this space will after time T be at a distance at most T 1/p away from its starting point. In general determining Markov type of a given metric space is difficult (REF-peresschramm-etal). However we will only need the following rather intuitive and easy to prove fact:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".