MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097826917

DOI:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.01045.x

2007· article· en· W7097826917 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerotypeAntibiotic resistanceSalmonellaSalmonella entericaPhylogenetic treeAntimicrobialTypingAntibiotics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

antimicrobial resistance; Typhimurium; parallel evolution; public health; bacteria. The increase in frequency of Salmonella enterica resistant to antibiotics in food-producing animals is of great concern to public health. Determining the rate at which different resistance phenotypes are generated and maintained in the environment is thus of great importance. The distribution and evolution of antibiotic resistance and multidrug-resistance in 362 Salmonella stains as part of a cross-sectional study of the Canadian swine industry were investigated. The susceptibility of all isolates to 12 antimicrobial agents was tested and the statistical and phylogenetic distribution of resistance among strains characterized via multi-locus sequence typing was studied to test the origin of multidrug-resistance in Salmonella. More than 25 % of all isolates were multidrug-resistant, with pre-dominance in serotype Typhimurium, a serotype of vital importance to public health. The strong associations between resistance phenotypes, which differ among serotypes and which is supported by the significant genetic distance between serotypes, was indicative of the independent acquisition of multidrug-resistance in at least two different serotypes, i.e. Typhimurium and Derby. The independent origin of multidrug-resistance in Salmonella indicates that strong selective pressures are present in the environment of the bacteria and that statistical and phylogenetic studies of antibiotic resistance are an essential part in the under-standing and the control of the epidemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9540.942

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology→French-language works237,207→