The Roles of Emerging and Conventional Technologies in Serving Children and Adolescents with Special Needs in Rural and Northern Communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
More than a century of Canadian and international experience and research in open and distance learning indicates that traditional and emerging technologies can be used effectively, alone or in combination, to provide access to services and education for adults and children living in rural and northern communities. How-ever, although there is an emerging literature about children with special needs, technology, and the North, it is at a preliminary stage and is fragmented across many professional communities, one of which is increasingly the field of open and distance learning. Research studies, pilot projects, and written reports need to be expanded and shared as a matter of priority. With appropriate research support and policy review, the promise of digital technologies can be realized to serve children with special needs, their families, teachers, and health care providers who live in rural and northern communities. Résumé Plus d’un siècle d’expériences canadienne et internationale et de recherche rela-tives aux systèmes d’apprentissage ouvert et en ligne nous ont enseigné que les hautes technologies et les technologies traditionnelles peuvent être utilisées effica-cement, seules ou ensemble, pour offrir l’accès aux services et à l’éducation pour les adultes et enfants vivant dans des communautés rurales et du Nord. Cepen-dant, malgré l’existence d’une littérature émergente relative aux enfants ayant des besoins particuliers, à la technologie et au Nord, celle-ci en est encore au stage préliminaire et est éparpillée dans de nombreuses communautés professionnelles, en particulier dans le champ de l’apprentissage ouvert et à distance. Les re-cherches, projets pilotes et rapports écrits doivent être développés et partagés prioritairement. Grâce au soutien à la recherche et à une révision des politiques appropriées, les potentialités des technologies numériques peuvent être réalisées, au service des enfants ayant des besoins particuliers, ainsi que leur famille, profes-seurs et fournisseurs de soins de santé habitant dans les communautés rurales et du Nord.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".