Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/13/06 CASTOR: A FLAGSHIP CANADIAN SPACE TELESCOPE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Cosmological Advanced Survey Telescope for Optical and uv Research (CASTOR) is a pro-posed CSA-led mission that would carry out panoramic imaging in the ultraviolet and blue-optical region ( ≈ 150–550 nm). Operating close to the diffraction limit, the 1m CASTOR telescope would have a spatial resolution comparable to the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), but with an instantaneous field of view about two hundred times larger. The scientific impact from such a facility would be im-mense, covering topics ranging from small bodies in the outer solar system to the equation of state of the universe. CASTOR has the potential to be a significant, unique and highly strategic Canadian contribution to the international portfolio of astronomical facilities in the 2020s, complementing high-profile optical/IR space missions (Euclid, WFIRST) and ground-based telescopes (LSST) currently under development in Europe and the United States. By placing Canada at the forefront of astro-nomical research in the coming decade, CASTOR would showcase the technological capabilities of Canadian industries to an international audience, and inspire the next generation of young Canadians to pursue careers in science, engineering and technology. To achieve maximum scientific impact, and to enable effective international partnerships (including
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".