MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097854730

P317-WE PAH DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE FRASER RIVER BASIN AND ARCTIC OCEAN: NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE USE OF PAH RATIOS AS INDICATORS OF PAH SOURCE AND COMPOSITION

2015· article· en· W7097854730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticSedimentParticulatesBeaufort seaDrainage basinTotal organic carbonThe arcticHydrology (agriculture)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent sediments the parent and alkyl-substituted PAHs may derive from anthropogenic (fossil fuels and combustion) and natural sources (oil seeps, bitumens, coal, plant debris, forest and prairie fires). Since the PAH compositions of the two sources overlap, especially for parent PAHs, the significance of anthropogenic PAH in the environment must be evaluated against a dynamic background of natural PAH. Despite this source dichotomy, PAHs provide some of the most definitive and ubiquitous tracers of organic matter in aquatic systems (Yunker et al., 2002, and references therein). Sediment and suspended particulate samples used for this study have been obtained from the Fraser River basin, B.C., Canada (Yunker et al., 2002), the Beaufort, Chukchi, Barents and Laptev Seas, and from the central Arctic Ocean basins (Canadian, Eurasian and Greenland Sea basins). PAH analyses were performed by Axys Analytical Services Ltd. of Sidney, B.C. using selective ion monitoring GC/MS. The original laboratory chromatograms from Axys were used to obtain concentration data for all of the mass 276 and 278 PAHs and 1,7- and 2,6-dimethylphenanthrene. Literature for the last 6 years has been reviewed to update the characteristic PAH ratios for An/(Pn + An), Fl/(Fl + Py), BaA/(BaA + Ch) and IP/(IP + Bghi) for petroleum, single-source combustion and environmental samples presented in Yunker et al., (2002), and to add source PAH ratios for BF/(BF + BeP) (see PAH abbreviations below). PAHs in Arctic Ocean sediments demonstrate a continuum of inputs that range from primarily petroleum (the Beaufort Sea) to primarily combustion (the Barents Sea) and also exhibit negligible anthropogenic input. Such a data set is ideal for calibrating PAH ratios for PAHs with little or no literature source data available. In the Arctic Ocean data set there are significant (p < 0.001) linear relationships

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact→French-language works237,207→