DRDC Toronto CR 2006-298 Assessment of the effect of No Stay, Bent Stay or Straight Stay when the Clothe the Soldier Rucksack is worn with the Fragmentation Vest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Clothe the Soldier (CTS) load carriage system includes the Fragmentation Protection Vest (FPV) with Bullet Resistant Plates (BRP), Tactical Vest (TV), the Rucksack, and a Small Pack System which have been designed to be compatible. Loads carried in the CTS rucksack often exceed the officially recommended 25 kg and are reported to approach 45 kg. Under these conditions, optimizing load distribution onto the torso becomes even more essential. The purpose of this work was to examine the effects of various stays in the rucksack (straight stays, bent stays, and no stay) on pressure effects and load distribution to the body. Results showed that wearing the FPV and TV under the rucksack will increase the compressive load on the upper body by 50 to 100 percent, depending on the stay configuration compared with wearing just the TV and Rucksack configuration. Stays bent to conform to the body were the most effective configuration while removal of the stays caused the greatest increase in compressive loads. Edges of the BRP caused multiple peak pressure points of with values on the mannikin of 60 to 110 kPa. These pressure values are expected to considerably exceed the tissue tolerance of skin and underlying muscle and are
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".