MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097936727

JOURNAL OF BLACK PSYCHOLOGY / MAY 2000 Boatswain, Lalonde / BLACK IDENTITY IN CANADA Social Identity and Preferred Ethnic/ Racial Labels for Blacks in Canada

2015· article· en· W7097936727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRacial and Ethnic Identity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Social identity theoryEthnic groupAfrican descentRace (biology)Social groupIdentification (biology)African americanSelf identification
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of studies conducted in the United States have found that Black and Afri-can American are the preferred labels for ethnic/racial self-designation by Blacks. The purpose of this study was to assess which labels were preferred (and disliked) by a sample of Black Canadian students (N = 101), as well as to uncover the per-sonal meanings of their preferred labels. In addition, the relationships between la-bel preferences and measures of ethnic/racial identity developed in America (Afri-can Self-Consciousness Scale, Black Racial Identity Attitude Scale) and Canada (York Ethnic Identification Scale) were examined. Although Black was the most preferred label, the following four types of preferred labels were identified: Black, Africentric, Caribbean, and Canadian. Different label preferences were associ-ated with different measures of social identity. Issues of social identity and eth-nic/racial self-designation for Blacks in Canada are discussed. The process of social identification and group labeling for North Ameri-cans of African descent is an evolving one that has been studied by a number of researchers. All of this research, however, has been conducted within the United States, and it is not clear whether findings from such studies would generalize to other countries such as Canada. The purpose of this study was to examine social identity and self-labeling in a sample of Black Canadians. The evolution of racial labels in America has been reviewed by Smith (1992; see also Smitherman, 1991). In his article, Smith traces the evolution of labels from Colored to Negro to Black to the more contemporary African American. As Smith shows, this latter label is currently the label of choice for organizations representing Blacks in the United States and is being used with AUTHORS ’ NOTE: Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Richard N.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchFrench-language works237,207