Abstract The Comprehensive Career Needs Survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
was used to assess the career plans of senior high students in Southern Alberta, Canada. This article examines senior high student perceptions regarding (a) their future plans; (b) confidence in attaining their career goals, (c) importance of remaining in their community; and (d) where they anticipate working. The majority of respon-dents planned to combine full time education with part time work, were confident in achieving their career plans, and anticipated finding work in their country. Results indicate a need for programs addressing career decision making and combining education and work experience. Résume ́ Plans de carrière des étudiants de fin du secondaire: résultats du Comprehensive Career Needs Surveydans l’Alberta du Sud, Canada. Le Com-prehensive Career Needs Survey a éte ́ utilise ́ pour évaluer les plans de carrière d’étudiants de fin du secondaire dans l’Alberta du Sud, Canada. Cet article examine les perceptions d’étudiants de fin du secondaire concernant (a) leurs plans d’avenir; (b) leur degre ́ de confiance dans l’atteinte de leurs buts de carrière; (c) l’importance qu’ils accordent au fait de rester dans leur commu-naute ́ et (d) ou ̀ ils prévoient de travailler. La majorite ́ de répondants prévoient de combiner des études a ̀ temps plein et un travail a ̀ mi-temps, ont confiance dans la réalisation de leurs plans de carrière et anticipent de trouver du travail dans leur pays. Les résultats indiquent un besoin de programmes aidant a ̀ la prise de décision de carrière et combinant études et expérience professionnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".