Background Wheat Dependent Exercise Induced Anaphylaxis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(WDEIA) is a form of Food Dependent Exercise Induced Anaphylaxis. WDEIA occurs when there is an allergic reaction following the ingestion of wheat, coupled with exercise [1]. The suspected allergen that is responsible for WDEIA is omega- 5- gliadin [2]. We report a series of adult clinical cases of WDEIA recorded between 2006-2009 at Health Sciences Centre (Winnipeg). The purpose of this study was to compare the results of Skin Prick Test (SPT) to commercial wheat extract and wheat flour in patients with WDEIA. Materials and methods We preformed a retrospective chart review of 8 patients with WDEIA. We recorded response to SPT for commer-cial wheat extract (Omega, Allergy Canada) and wheat flour. Results The patients were 25-63 years old, 5/8 were female. All patients had histories of wheat consumption followed by exercise (or stress) resulting in allergic reactions. 5/8 cases were SPT negative to commercial wheat extract but positive to wheat flour. 1/8 was SPT negative with both commercial wheat extract and wheat flour, but positive with the wheat product (bun), which by history provoked a reaction. 1/8 was SPT positive to both. 1/8 was positive to wheat extract but SPT to wheat flour was not done. When patients adhered to wheat avoidant diets no reactions occurred. Conclusion In the 8 adults reviewed with WDEIA, SPT with wheat flour was much more sensitive than SPT with commercial wheat extract. Therefore, both commercial wheat extract and wheat flour should be used for SPT to diagnose
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".