Bibliographic record
Abstract
The kiss of death: hpv rejected by religion Although hpv infections are transmitted mainly through sexual intercourse, they are also frequently transmitted non-sexually; consequently adults and children alike are often infected6. Non-sexual forms of transmission include various forms of kissing, verti-cal transmission from mother to child at birth, social physical contacts, and latency in the respiratory tract7,8. The prevalences of alcohol- and tobacco-derived cancers are waning, but head-and-neck cancers from hpv are increasing9. VACCINES Vaccines that protect against the development of hpv morbidity have proved to be effective. The most prevalent vaccines are Gardasil (Sanofi Pasteur msd, Lyon, France), a quadrivalent vaccine against oncogenic hpv-6,-11,-16, and-18; and Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, U.K.), a dual vaccine against hpv-16 and-18. Both products, particularly the former, have proved to be effective at preventing hpv morbidity10,11. Vaccination programs have targeted young girls, but there is no reason to exclude young boys. Both sexes are affected, and young boys would act as a reservoir for infection should only young girls be immunized. Vaccination before sexual debut for all youth is therefore the logical target12. THE CHALLENGE Religion provides many guiding influences on human social behavior. Consequently, religious leaders bear a heavy responsibility in providing leadership and behavioral advice to their adherents. Most exhort health-promoting attitudes, behavioral patterns, and practices, but sometimes, religious leaders, ignorant or immune to scientific evidence, may frankly advise or counsel wrong choices. That case holds for Bishop Frederick Henry of Calgary and other Roman Catho-lic bishops in Alberta, Canada. According to a recent
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.067 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".