Award-Winning Undergraduate Paper Price Discrimination and Pricing to Market Behavior of Canadian
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of exchange rate fluctuation on the pricing behavior of Canadian canola exporters to Japan, Mexico, and the U.S. is examined using a model identifying noncompetitive and exchange rate related pricing behavior. Price discrimination was identified for Canadian canola exports to the three destinations over the period of 1993–99. Results also suggest that Pricing to Market strategies were employed for Japanese imports. Canadian canola exporters used local currency price stabilization to dampen the effects of relative price changes in the Japanese currency, perhaps linked to the large size of Japanese imports relative to Mexico and the U.S. The Canadian agrifood industry, with its long tradition of international trade, has faced substantial changes in exchange rate vari-ability in recent years. Whereas the overall trade effect of exchange rate changes can be complicated by the depreciating Canadian dollar’s impact on macroeconomic perfor-mance (Coleman and Meilke), the declining U.S./Canada exchange rate generally encour-ages U.S. imports of Canadian goods. With-out adjusting the change, depreciation of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. currency makes the purchase of Canadian commodities more attractive to U.S. buy-ers. Because many foreign agricultural com-modity transactions are denominated in a common currency (Pick and Carter), and because U.S. dollar dominates numerous world markets, Canadian currency deprecia-tion relative to the U.S. dollar may further strengthen Canada’s export position world-wide. However, Canadian exporters may react to exchange rate fluctuation, making their pricing decision based on such factors as the importing country, whether the varia-tion is considered permanent or temporary,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".