MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098065686

Author manuscript, published in "IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Montreal: Canada (2006)" DOI: 10.1109/ISIE.2006.295519 Time-Frequency Characterization using Instantaneous Moment Concept:

2008· article· en· W7098065686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoment (physics)Transient (computer programming)Instantaneous phaseMultipath propagationWaveformSIGNAL (programming language)Characterization (materials science)WaveletSignal processing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract- The instantaneous frequency law (IFL) is a very important element when the physical parameters of the corresponding signal have to be evaluated. Blind equalisation, modulation recognition and mechanical diagnostic are just three domains where the non-stationarity behavior of the signal imposes the IFL estimation. Generally, an IFL is composed by slowly varying time-frequency structures separated by fast transitions which could be considered as phase discontinuities. Digital phase modulations or signals propagated trough a multipath channel are typical examples of IFLs having fast transient parts. The common methods employed for these operations are wavelet transform and Cohen’s class time-frequency representation, respectively. In this paper we propose an alternative based on the instantaneous moments. By an appropriate choice of the moment order and lags it is possible to accurately estimate the both transient and slowly time-frequency parts. While this method uses one dimensional data and, thanks to its recursive structure, it is well suited for real time applications. Therefore, its real-time implementation on TMS320C6x structure is described. On the other hand, few examples on realistic data will show the practical interest for this method. I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207