THE EFFICACY OF ETHANEDINITRILE TO CONTROL WOOD RELATED INSECT PESTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of fumigants is the economical and practical method to control stored grain pests, quarantine pests, soil borne pathogens and nematodes. For quarantine purpose, all perishable and durable commodity pests have been fumigated mainly with methyl bromide (MeBr). Under the Clean Air Act and Montreal Protocol on ozone depleting, the use of MeBr as soil fumigant (73 % of global MeBr consumption in 2000) is restricted and under scheduled phasing out by 2005 in developed counties and 2015 in developing counties, although there are exemptions for QPS (Quarantine and Pre-shipment) and CUE (Critical Use Exemption). Since MeBr phase out schedule, 72,967tonne of global consumption of MeBr including QPS decreased to 30,030t in 2005. This decrease is mainly due to MeBr alternatives in soil not in QPS. MeBr in QPS use is increasing (16,304t in 2005, approximately 8.7 % increase based on 1996) because of increasing of global trades and protection of agro-ecosystem in imported counties against quarantine pest. There are few chemical alternatives commercially available to control wood related pest. Sulfuryl fluoride (SF) is comparative to MeBr in terms of effectiveness and has been extensively studied
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".