The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, Vol. X-1, 1980 Business Administration Students in Five Canadian Universities: A Study of Values
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the Allport-Vernon-Lindzey (A VL) for measuring dominant values, 513 business administration students from five schools in the Prairie Region were tested. The A VL scale measures relative importance of student values in six basic areas: theoretical, econo-mic, aesthetic, social, political and religious. The sample included 349 men and 164 women enrolled in different class levels (years 1 to 4) in five schools of business. Significant differences were found between business student values and the norms for the general college population, and between the values of male and female business adminis-tration students. Differences were progressively less significant when business students were compared by class levels and by schools. RÉSUMÉ En utilisant l'échelle Allport-Vernon-Lindzey (A VL) pour mesurer les valeurs dominantes, on a échantilloné 513 étudiants des cours d'administration commerciale à cinq établisse-ments de la région des Prairies. L'échelle A VL mesure l'importance relative des valeurs des étudiants dans six champs fondamentaux: les domaines théorique, économique, esthétique, social, politique et religieux. L'échantillon comprenait 349 hommes et 164 femmes inscrits à divers niveaux (première année jusqu 'à la quatrième année) de cinq écoles d'administra-tion. On a constaté des différences significatives entre les valeurs des étudiants en adminis-tration et les normes pour la population générale des établissements post-secondaires, et aussi entre les valeurs des étudiants mâles et celles des étudiants femelles en administration commerciale. Les différences se faisaient progressivement moins significatives quand on comparait entre eux les étudiants en administration de différentes années ou fréquentant différentes établissements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".