MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7098283746

BRIEFING PAPER TO THE ECONOMIC AND MONETARY COMMITTEE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FIRST QUARTER 2005

2005· article· en· W7098283746 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)Purchasing powerConsumer spendingGoods and servicesRelative priceInvestment (military)Real gross domestic productQuarter (Canadian coin)Oil consumptionProfit (economics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1) The Euro Area is highly vulnerable to oil price shocks The world economy is vulnerable to oil price shocks and so it is that of the Euro Area. In principle, a country vulnerability to energy prices depends on its total volume of net oil imports as a percentage of GDP and of its total oil consumption as a percentage of GDP. The higher its ratio of net oil imports to GDP the higher will be the deterioration of its trade and current account balance and the more adverse will turn its terms of trade. This first effect tends to have a negative impact on the supply side of the economy by increasing the cost of the production of goods and services due to the increase of the relative price of the energy inputs, thus, reducing the profit margins of firms and their investment flows and employment rates. The higher the ratio of oil consumption to GDP, the higher will be its negative impact will be on the Consumer Price Index, reducing the purchasing power of consumers and their disposable income therefore, reducing overall consumption demand. Given a budget constraint, as the oil consumption demand is far more rigid, mainly in transport services, the reduction of consumption affects other goods and services which are considered by the consumer to be less superior. The magnitude of this second effect will depend on the degree of monetary response

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0210.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→