MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098411254

THE ECONOMIC CHALLENGES OF DEWATERING AT THE VICTOR DIAMOND MINE IN NORTHERN

2015· article· en· W7098411254 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDewateringDrawdown (hydrology)CarbonateHydrogeologyInflowShaft miningCoal miningHydraulic conductivityLimiting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The challenges of mining economically have never been greater than under current global financial conditions. The costs and efficiency of dewatering are particularly important at De Beers Canada’s Victor diamond mine in northern Ontario where: 1) the bottom of the water-bearing carbonate country rocks is near the bottom of the planned pit, limiting the available drawdown in perimeter wells; 2) the majority of inflow to the wells comes from a very limited number of discrete zones in the carbonate rocks, resulting in low hydraulic efficiencies of the wells; 3) line power to the mine is limited, mandating efficient pumping over a wide range of yields and lifts; and 4) the relatively isolated northern setting and extreme cold winter temperatures (which can reach-40 to-60 deg C) present logistical issues (e.g., insulation of wellheads and pipelines, and having to truck in heavy materials over an ice road during a relatively short period of time). The hydrogeology of the Victor mine area was characterised over three relatively short winter field seasons using packer tests, pumping tests, step-drawdown tests, and downhole logging (particularly production or “spinner ” logs) to define the lateral and vertical variation in the hydraulic conductivity of the carbonate aquifer. Based on analysis of the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207