MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098436676

Background

2015· article· en· W7098436676 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioactive natural compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomScannerSIGNAL (programming language)Interventional magnetic resonance imagingImage processingTranslation (biology)Image stitchingImage qualityImage resolution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The clinical translation of MRI-guided cardiovascular catheterization has been limited by the unavailability of devices that are both visible and safe under MRI. In par-ticular, rigid metallic guidewires are essential for most catheterization procedures and are at risk of heating during MR imaging [1]. Here we present an MRI method that simultaneously improves the visualization of commercially available nitinol guidewires and mini-mizes RF induced heating. Methods RF-efficient gradient echo spiral imaging was chosen to minimize heating (8 interleaves, TE/TR = 0.86/10ms, flip angle = 10°). Through-slice dephasing generated a positive contrast “device image ” [2], exploiting local field inhomo-geneity such that the metallic guidewire appears hyperin-tense with background signal suppressed. An anatomical image and a device image were interleaved in alternating frames. Image processing (signal thresholding and selec-tion of elongated structures) was performed on the device image to isolate the guidewire signal from other sources of field inhomogeneity. Imaging was performed on a 1.5T MRI scanner (Aera, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). MRI-guided left heart catheterization was performed in a pig using a 0.035 ” com-mercially available nitinol guidewire (Nitrex, Covidien, Ply-mouth, MN). The RF induced temperature rise at the tip of an insulated nitinol rod during MR imaging was mea-sured in the ASTM 2182 gel phantom using a fiberoptic temperature probe (OpSense, Quebec, Canada). Results A pair of anatomical and device images were generated with a temporal resolution of 160ms (80ms per image), or 6.25 frames/s. Image processing occurred in real-time and a color overlay of the device on the anatomy was dis-played to the operator for guidance during catheterization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3100.137

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBioactive natural compoundsFrench-language works237,207